This is indeed easier than cut-and-paste of the image name into Word--I'm glad it was doable for you.
And I even almost understood it. I have this terrible suspicion that I might be , though I can't figure out who is. Not you, of course, and not Marc, who's "Spot"--Jadelennox? She'd be the logical other person, but I'm not sure why she'd be "Rikchik-Rock".
As I recently pointed out (http://www.livejournal.com/users/cnoocy/33089.html), the "M"odifier aspect of "Rikchik" means "Green". When words are turned into "N"ames, their former aspects are erased, making it hard to tell the difference between the human named "long weapon" and the human named "long fight" or even "long fighter". Fortunately, one of those is more obviously correct.
I believe he said that the person named Long-Fight and the person named Rikchik-Rock want to see human-words below rikchik-words, and Denis thus provides that. (See the "captioned" and the "captioned-and-diagrammed" links.)
Yeah, and it kind of scares me. Of course, in this case the medium was the message: it would have been a lot harder to understand Message X if the content of Message X was more than "Message X exists." :-)
![[identity profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/openid.png){kind=small}
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
branchandroot
no subject
Date: 2004-05-19 03:18 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-05-19 04:39 pm (UTC)And I even almost understood it. I have this terrible suspicion that I might be
no subject
Date: 2004-05-19 05:29 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-05-19 06:09 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-05-19 06:16 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-05-19 06:31 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-05-19 06:17 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-05-19 05:10 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-05-19 05:19 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-05-19 05:30 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-05-19 06:38 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-05-19 06:49 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-05-20 01:19 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-05-20 01:38 pm (UTC):)